Reply to Klocksiem on the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm
2020
In a recent article in this journal, I claimed that the widely held counterfactual comparative account of harm (CCA) violates two very plausible principles about harm and prudential reasons. Justin Klocksiem argues, in a reply, that CCA is in fact compatible with these principles. In this rejoinder, I shall try to show that Klocksiem’s defense of CCA fails.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
9
References
2
Citations
NaN
KQI