The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure.

2009 
BACKGROUND: Closure with dermal sutures is time consuming, may increase the risks of infl ammation and infection secondary to foreign body reaction, exposes the surgeon to possible needlestick injuries, and has variable cosmetic outcomes depending on each surgeon’s technique. The absorbable INSORB dermal stapler is hypothesized to be faster and more cost effective than sutures for dermal layer closures and provides a safer and more consistent result. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction with tissue expanders had one incision randomized to dermal closure with absorbable dermal staples. The contralateral side was closed with dermal sutures. During the expansion period, wounds were assessed by a blinded plastic surgeon using the 13-point Vancouver Scar Scale. At the time of implant exchange, both scars were excised and examined for histologic signs of infl ammation. RESULTS: Eleven patients (22 incisions) were enrolled in the study. The dermal stapler was four times faster than standard suture closure, reducing closure time by 10.5 minutes (p Scar Scale score than sutures because of superior wound eversion, a benefi cial characteristic for wound healing. By 4 months postoperatively, no signifi cant difference in scar scores was found between interventions. At 6 months, histologic analysis suggested decreased infl ammatory cell invasion of the dermal stapler-closed scar. CONCLUSION: Closure using the absorbable dermal stapler can be performed signifi cantly faster than standard suture closure techniques, allowing for a more cost-effective incisional closure with equivalent cosmetic results.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    8
    References
    36
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []