Initial understory response to experimental silvicultural treatments in a temperate oak-dominated forest

In recent decades, alternative management techniques integrating conservation concerns into industrial forestry have become increasingly widespread. In order to compare the effects of various management methods on forest site and biodiversity, a systematic forestry experiment was conducted in a managed, mature oak–hornbeam forest. The present work introduces the 2-year responses of environmental variables and understory vegetation to different silvicultural treatments. These belong either to clear-cutting (clear-cutting, retention tree group), to shelterwood (preparation cutting), or to continuous cover forestry systems (gap-cutting). The experiment follows a complete block design with four replicates. Light availability was significantly higher in all the treatments than in the uncut control, with highest values in the clear-cuts. Soil moisture was highest in the gap-cuts and clear-cuts, while in the retention tree group, it did not differ from the control. Species richness, cover, and height of the understory considerably differed from the control in the clear-cuts and gap-cuts, while in the retention tree group, only species richness was higher. The establishment of ruderal, non-forest species altered the species composition in the clear-cuts. Based on these short-term responses, we conclude that as a result of the extreme environmental changes, clear-cutting in oak–hornbeam forests changes the understory vegetation considerably. Retention tree groups can maintain legacies of the understory composition for some years. Despite the experienced high vegetation cover, gap-cutting preserves the forest characteristics of the understory better than clear-cutting. These results confirm that in oak–hornbeam forests, continuous cover forestry may be more sustainable from conservational aspect than clear-cutting system.