[Hip prosthesis infection: diagnostic approach and treatment of 27 cases].

1994 
BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of hip prosthesis infection (HPI) is difficult. There is no therapeutic option which is completely effective and without risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate a diagnostic approach and therapeutic strategy in a group of patients with HPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 27 episodes of HPI diagnosed by anatomopathologic and/or microbiologic examination of surgical samples was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with 27 episodes of HPI out of a total of 24 hip prosthesis (HP) were treated. The infection was early in 15 episodes. The etiologic agents were plasmocoagulase negative staphylococcus (NSP) in 11 cases, P. aeruginosa in 8, S. aureus in 5, Enterococcus sp. in 2 and miscellaneous in the remaining cases. In 2 cases the infection was polymycrobial. Following a mean follow period of 22.6 +/- 15.2 months, 13 out of the 14 patients in whom the prosthesis was withdrawn were cured (in 4 a second prosthesis was implanted), one out of 6 in those in whom the prosthesis remained in situ following debridement, and 2 out of 3 episodes in whom reimplantation was performed over time. The withdrawal of the prosthesis was significantly greater than debridement in the treatment of early infection (p < 0.001). The total mean length of postoperative antibiotherapy was 48.2 +/- 17 days. No differences were observed in the oral versus parenteral treatment (p = 0.22), and nor was prognosis worse in those treated for less than 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience suggests that attempts to save a hip prosthesis in early infection usually fail. In addition to prosthesis withdrawal or implantation of another prosthesis, six weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, which may be oral route, appear to be sufficient.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    0
    References
    3
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []