Clinical trial: clarithromycin vs. levofloxacin in first-line triple and sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

2010 
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31, 1077–1084 Summary Background Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple therapy have declined to unacceptable levels. Aim  To compare clarithromycin and levofloxacin in triple and sequential first-line regimens. Methods  A total of 460 patients were randomized into four 10-day therapeutic schemes (115 patients per group): (i) standard OCA, omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin; (ii) triple OLA, omeprazole, levofloxacin and amoxicillin; (iii) sequential OACM, omeprazole plus amoxicillin for 5 days, followed by omeprazole plus clarithromycin plus metronidazole for 5 days; and (iv) modified sequential OALM, using levofloxacin instead of clarithromycin. Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse effects and compliance were assessed by a questionnaire. Results  Per protocol cure rates were: OCA (66%; 95% CI: 57–74%), OLA (82.6%; 75–89%), OACM (80.8%; 73–88%) and OALM (85.2%; 78–91%). Intention-to-treat cure rates were: OCA (64%; 55–73%), OLA (80.8%; 73–88%), OACM (76.5%; 69–85%) and OALM (82.5%; 75–89%). Eradication rates were lower with OCA than with all the other regimens (P < 0.05). No differences in compliance or adverse effects were demonstrated among treatments. Conclusions  Levofloxacin-based and sequential therapy are superior to standard triple scheme as first-line regimens in a setting with high clarithromycin resistance. However, all of these therapies still have a 20% failure rate.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    38
    References
    113
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []