Individual and organizational determinants of alcohol screening and brief intervention implementation in emergency departments (SIPS-ED)
2012
Objectives: This study explored individual and organisational barriers to and facilitators of
effective implementation of alcohol screening and brief intervention in 9 Emergency
Departments (EDs). This study was part of a large UK research programme on Screening and
Intervention Programme for Sensible Drinking (SIPS).
Methods: Nine EDs were recruited in three regions of England and 282 ED staff (mean 31.3
per ED; range 8–82) were trained in the study and intervention procedures. ED staff were
required to deliver one of three screening tools and one of three brief interventions. All staff
received appropriate training and support. Staff attitudes were measured before (T1) and
straight after training (T2) as well as post implementation (T3) using the Short Alcohol and
Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire (SAAPPQ). Additional questions on organisational
factors affecting the implementation of SBI were asked at T2 and T3. Data were also
collected to measure the performance of screening and delivery of intervention in each
setting.
Results: While staff were keen to be trained and while their attitudes and motivations
significantly improved after training (p <.o1), there were several barriers to implementation
which limited SBI activity across most settings, including workload pressures, lack of time,
perceived lack of importance of alcohol in ED, high staff turnover, other competing priorities
and feeling forced to take on extra work.
Only 3 of 9 EDs were able to implement the protocol without additional input from the
research team beyond training and regular support. In the remaining EDs it was necessary to
deploy researchers and Alcohol Health Workers to complete screening and intervention.
Successful sites were noted to have a keen ‘clinical champion’ who prioritised the screening
and brief intervention activity, voluntary participation of ED staff, supportive managers, and a
small number of core staff who were keen to participate and able to be engaged by the
research team. Training large numbers of staff yielded less screening and intervention activity.
Conclusions: Implementation of SBI in ED will be difficult in clinical practice due to the
exigencies of ED care, and is likely in most cases to require delivery by dedicated outside
specialist alcohol staff. Successful implementation also depends on local clinical and
managerial champions and having a small number of dedicated staff who have responsibility
for delivery of SBI.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
1
Citations
NaN
KQI