Stalk Bending Strength is Strongly Associated with Maize Stalk Lodging Incidence Across Multiple Environments

2020 
Abstract Stalk lodging in maize results in substantial yield losses worldwide. These losses could be prevented through genetic improvement. However, breeding efforts and genetics studies are hindered by lack of a robust and economical phenotyping method for assessing stalk lodging resistance. A field-based phenotyping platform that induces failure patterns consistent with natural stalk lodging events and measures stalk bending strength in field-grown plants was recently developed. Here we examine the association between data gathered from this new phenotyping platform with counts of stalk lodging incidence on 47 maize hybrids representing a subset of genetic diversity. For comparative purposes, we examine four additional predictive phenotypes commonly assumed to be related to stalk lodging resistance; namely, rind penetrometer resistance (a.k.a. rind puncture resistance), cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Lodging incidence data were gathered on 47 hybrids, grown in 98 distinct environments, spanning four years and 41 unique geographical locations in North America. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed effects models, we show that stalk lodging incidence is associated with each of the five predictive phenotypes. Further, based on a joint analysis we demonstrate that, among the phenotypes considered, stalk bending strength measured by the new phenotyping platform is the strongest predictive phenotype of naturally occurring stalk lodging incidence in maize, followed by rind penetrometer resistance and cellulose content. This study demonstrates that field-based measurements of stalk bending strength provide a reliable estimate of stalk lodging incidence. The stalk bending strength data acquired from the new phenotyping platform will be valuable for phenotypic selection in breeding programs and for generating mechanistic insights into the genetic regulation of stalk lodging resistance.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    64
    References
    22
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []