The Clinical Utility of Esophageal Manometry

Background and Aims: Esophageal manometry (EM) is performed to evaluate symptoms of chest pain and dysphagia, although its clinical utility is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of EM by determining whether EM provides new information, changes diagnoses, or alters patient management. Methods: Before performing EM, referring providers noted indications for the test, symptoms, previous tests performed, and medication use. After EM was completed, a follow-up questionnaire ascertained whether EM provided new information or changed the patient's diagnosis or management plan. Patients provided demographic information. Results: During a 12-month period, 569 EMs were performed and 444 were available for inclusion; 286 fully completed questionnaires were returned (64%) and are the basis for this analysis. The mean age ( ± SD) at the time of manometry was 52 ( ± 15) years; 58% were women; 98% were white. EM was requested to assist placement of a pH measuring device (34%), and to evaluate symptoms of dysphagia (29%), chest pain (12%), or acid reflux (11%). Overall, 64% of EM were abnormal; 81% in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients, 74% in dysphagia, and 59% in chest pain. New information was obtained in 87% of patients, whereas a change in diagnosis occurred in 30% of patients, and management changed in 44% of patients. Conclusions: EM is a clinically useful test because it frequently provides new information and often changes patient diagnosis and management. The clinical utility of EM is greatest in patients with dysphagia.