Clinical Outcomes After Crossed-Limb vs. Conventional Endograft Configuration in Endovascular AAA Repair

2013 
Purpose: To report a case controlled analysis of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes using the crossed-limb (CxL) endovascular configuration vs. the straight-limb configuration (SLC).Methods: From January 2007 to July 2012, 27 patients (25 men; mean age 73.7±7.2 years, range 53–82) were treated by EVAR with the CxL technique. These patients were matched anatomically with 27 patients (27 men; mean age 72.4±7.4 years, range 52–86) who underwent EVAR using the same endograft and the standard SLC within a ±6-month period. Primary outcome measures included technical and clinical success and freedom from graft limb thrombosis, any type of endoleak, early or late secondary interventions, and aneurysm-related death estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: The median follow-up periods for the CxL and SLC groups were 29.9 (range 6–54) and 33.5 (range 6–59) months, respectively (p=0.81). The technical success rate was 100% in both groups, but mean procedure times were significantly longer in the CxL...
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    24
    References
    17
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []