Tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine immunosuppression: results in advanced-stage disease compared with historical controls treated exclusively with cyclosporine

Abstract A phase HI comparative trial of tacrolimus- vs. cyclosporine-based graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation showed less GVHD but poorer survival in the tacrolimus arm. To test the comparability of the two treatment arms with respect to baseline survival prognosis, a matched control study using exclusively cyclosporine-treated patients from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) database was performed. Controls were matched (2:1) based on age (within 5 years), disease, and pretransplant disease status. Two-year survival for tacrolimus-treated clinical trial patients was similar to that of their cyclosporine-treated matched controls (27 and 24%, respectively), and 2-year survival of the cyclosporine-treated clinical trial patients was similar to that of their cyclosporine-treated matched IBMTR controls (42 and 45%, respectively). Consistent with the clinical trial results, the cyclosporine-treated IBMTR controls matched to the tacrolimus group had significantly poorer 2-year survival than the cyclosporine-treated IBMTR controls matched to the cyclosporine group (24 and 45%, respectively; p Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1999;5(3):180-6.