Are metallic markers necessary for coronary artery bypass grafts? A study using X-ray computed tomography and selective graft angiography

Using X-ray computed tomography (CT) and selective graft angiography, the authors studied the necessity of metallic markers in coronary artery bypass grafts on 45 patients (mean age 57.2 years) with 87 saphenous vein grafts. Eight patients had 17 markers. X-ray CT was performed after surgery using an apparatus with a 1-second scanning time. Noncontrast X-ray CT was performed on horizontal sections, at 5-mm intervals, from the lower margin of the aortic arch to the lower left ventricle. A contrast medium was then injected into the antecubital vein (3 ml/second, total 30 ml) in one cross-section at the level of bifurcation of the pulmonary artery. Aortography (60° in the left anterior and oblique positions, 20 ml/second, total 40 ml) was performed concurrently. Selective graft angiography was taken in the same direction, using 4 cm right of the Judkins with reference to the aortographic image and position of five clips on the sternum. Aortography revealed 79 patent and 8 occluded grafts. Selective graft angiography was easily performed even in grafts without markers. A cross-section of the occulded graft could not be seen with X-ray CT. Grafts with markers were often masked by artifacts produced by markers on X-ray CT. The number of observed graft slices (marker-positive grafts) was only 1.2±1.1 slices, significantly (p<0.01) lower than marker-negative grafts (4.1±3.1 slices). In particular, the number of marker-positive right coronary artery grafts was 0.4±0.9 slices. Four of five right coronary artery grafts were unobservable due to artifacts. In grafts without markers, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of X-ray CT to graft patency were 100%, 85.7%, 98.4%, 100%, and 98.6%, respectively. This study suggests that metallic markers may not be necessary for coronary artery bypass grafts.