Systematic use of short unicortical epiphyseal locking screws versus full-length unicortical locking screws in distal radius fracture volar plating: A prospective and comparative study.

PURPOSE Volar locking plates, used in distal radius fracture (DRF), present a risk of injuring extensor tendons with screws penetrating the dorsal cortex of the radius. Actually, even when aiming to use maximum-length unicortical locking screws, some still could be bicortical. We hypothesize the use of only short unicortical screws would allow a proper stabilization of the radial epiphysis without the risk of dorsal cortex penetration. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective monocentric non-randomized study was conducted. Patients with DRF (excepted for partial dorsal joint fractures) were treated in group A with short locking epiphyseal screws (16 mm for females, 18 mm for males) and in group B with full-length unicortical locking screws. Ultrasound was done 3 months postoperatively to evaluate the number and length of prominent dorsal screws. X-rays were performed after 6 weeks to assess stability according to volar tilt and radial inclination variations. RESULTS There were 37 patients in group A and 39 in group B with 148 and 156 epiphyseal screws, respectively. In group A, there were 0% of dorsal penetrating screws against 6.5% (10 screws from 8 patients) in group B (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for the stability between the groups: mean volar tilt variation ( - 0.6° vs. - 0.7°) and mean radial inclination variation ( - 0.4° vs. - 0.4°). CONCLUSION For a same stability with volar locking plates for DRF, short epiphyseal locking screws should be preferred to full-length unicortical screws in order to prevent extensor tendon injuries. Based on 75% of distal radial average anteroposterior width for each sex, screw lengths of 16 mm for females and 18 mm for males seem to be the length to use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2: Prospective, Comparisons made, non-randomized.