Spatial trends of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in Canadian fish and implications for long‐term monitoring

A nationwide study was conducted to examine concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in top predatory fish, with a focus on lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), across Canada, and to explore possible influences of food web processes. Concentrations of the three most abundant PBDE homolog groups (tetra-, penta-, and hexa-PBDEs) were, for the most part, higher in Great Lakes and Lake Champlain fish compared with fish from other systems. The Canadian Federal Environmental Quality Guideline for the penta-homolog was exceeded in 70% of the fish examined. However, virtually no guideline exceedances were found for other congeners. In general, PBDE-47 (a representative lower brominated congener) was significantly and positively correlated with fish length, weight, age, lipid content, and stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon. Significant differences in the slopes of the PBDE-47/covariate relationships between sites prevented concentrations from being adjusted using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). However, plots showed that elevated concentrations of PBDE-47 in Great Lakes and Lake Champlain fish remained after accounting for the influence of covariates. In contrast, for PBDE-183 (a representative higher brominated congener), the relationships between fish concentrations and covariates were not consistent, which could be a result of biotransformation being more important in controlling its bioaccumulation. The data from the current study show an overall disconnect between fish PBDE concentrations and likely loadings, which may be caused by differences in food web processes between systems. Continued long-term fish contaminant monitoring is needed to evaluate potential risk to fish and their consumers. However, we also recommend sediment sampling and focused food web studies to provide information on PBDE inputs to the systems and mechanisms of biomagnification, respectively. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011; 30:1564–1575. © 2011 SETAC