Safe Value Functions.

The relationship between safety and optimality in control is not well understood, and they are often seen as important yet conflicting objectives. There is a pressing need to formalize this relationship, especially given the growing prominence of learning-based methods. Indeed, it is common practice in reinforcement learning to simply modify reward functions by penalizing failures, with the penalty treated as a mere heuristic. We rigorously examine this relationship, and formalize the requirements for safe value functions: value functions that are both optimal for a given task, and enforce safety. We reveal the structure of this relationship through a proof of strong duality, showing that there always exists a finite penalty that induces a safe value function. This penalty is not unique, but upper-unbounded: larger penalties do not harm optimality. Although it is often not possible to compute the minimum required penalty, we reveal clear structure of how the penalty, rewards, discount factor, and dynamics interact. This insight suggests practical, theory-guided heuristics to design reward functions for control problems where safety is important.