Islam and the Urinary Stoma: A Contemporary Theological and Urological Dilemma

Abstract Background The prayer ritual is an essential component of Islam that requires entry into a state of physical purity ( wudhu ) through ablution, which is invalidated by voiding. An important dilemma for patients and surgeons may arise when a Muslim patient is counselled on cystectomy because of the belief by some that an incontinent urinary diversion will automatically invalidate their wudhu . Objective To determine if there are any religious barriers and implications for Muslim patients undergoing an incontinent urinary diversion. Design, setting, and participants A questionnaire was distributed to all UK mosques, addressed to the imam ( n  = 804). Results and limitations A total of 134 imams (response rate 16.7%) responded. There was general agreement among imams, with >90% answering that it is possible for a Muslim to perform ablution, pray, and enter a mosque with a urinary stoma. The majority of imams (86.6%) also stated that refusal of a urinary stoma was not justified by religious teachings. When asked if patients should choose the option of a neobladder despite this surgery having greater risk, 57.5% of respondents stated that they were either unsure or agreed with this alternative. Conclusions The majority of imams agreed that Muslims with a urinary stoma are able to maintain their ablution, allowing them to conduct their daily prayers, and that this form of surgery should not be refused on religious grounds. Our study suggests that the consensus view is that a urinary stoma is not contraindicated with regard to the practice of Islamic prayer rituals. Patient summary In this study we investigated if having a urinary stoma would be a religious barrier for Muslim patients in performing their obligatory prayer rituals. The overwhelming majority of imams stated that having a urinary stoma should not stop Muslim patients practising important aspects of their faith.