Influence of Match Congestion on Performances in the National Basketball Association.

The ability to recover from official match-play across a single and multiple matches is often considered a key factor in subsequent performance for modern professional basketball. The aims of this study were to: (i) explore the differences in match performances between different match congestion cycles (i.e. matches separated by zero, one, or two or greater days of rest); and (ii) identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) discriminating between winning and losing during different match congestion cycles. The current study indicated that scoring close to (i.e. within the paint) (ES = 0.08) or very far away (i.e. Three-point, ES = 0.05) was significantly greater for winning matches separated by one- and two-days of rest compared to consecutive matches (i.e. zero rest days between matches). Additionally, shooting efficiency (P<0.001), and attaining Defensive Rebounds (P<0.001) and Steals (P<0.001), were significant offensive and defensive KPIs that differentiated winning and losing teams. Similarly, opponent quality and match pace were important situational variables that affected match outcome during different match congestion cycles. While match location had an impact on winning following one- and two-days of rest, it had no impact for back-to-back matches (i.e. zero days between matches). The current results will support coaches’ offensive, defensive and recovery strategies during various match congestion cycles for a greater probability of winning NBA matches.