Erosional origin of drumlins and megaridges

Abstract The erodent layer hypothesis (ELH) proposes that drumlinization leaves no substantial stratigraphic record because it is primarily an erosional process that cuts an unconformity across pre-existing bed materials. Drumlins most commonly have autochthonous cores of antecedent till(s), other stiff and coarse-grained sediment and rock or any combination thereof, and are also found closely juxtaposed with rock drumlins within the same flow sets (‘mixed beds’). This is at odds with the suggested growth of drumlins by vertical accretion (‘emergence’) from deforming subglacial till (‘soft beds’). ELH argues that drumlins ‘grow down’ by erosional carving of pre-existing stiff till, sediment and/or rock by a thin ( Megadrumlins, drumlins and megaridges comprise an erosional continuum in many flow sets. This records the progressive dissection of large streamlined bedforms to form successively more elongate daughter drumlins and megaridges (‘clones’) as the bed is lowered to create a low-slip surface that allows fast ice flow and ice streaming. Clones are the ‘missing links’ in the continuum. ELH predicts preservation within drumlins of antecedent remnant tills and stratigraphies deposited earlier in the glacial cycle under sluggish or steady-state ice flows that were then streamlined by erosion under streaming ice flows. The erodent layer may be preserved as a relatively thin, loosely-consolidated surficial till that drapes the streamlined bedform (the ‘upper till’, ‘cap till’, ‘till veneer’, ‘till mantle’, ‘retreat till’, or ‘englacial debris’ of many previous reports). ELH suggests that there is a fundamental commonality of all forms of erosional wear and streamlining on sliding interfaces from the microscopic scale to the macroscopic scale of ice sheet beds.