Gendered Differences in Teaching Performance Evaluations of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

OBJECTIVE Teaching performance evaluations are commonly used for career development and advancement. Due to possible gendered expectations, implicit or explicit bias may emerge in evaluations completed by learners. This study investigated how third-year medical students evaluated teaching performance of obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians based on resident gender. SETTING This study was conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. DESIGN This retrospective mixed methods study examined teaching performance evaluations of obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians from 2010 to 2018, completed by third-year medical students. A two-sample, two-sided t-test was used to compare numerical scores. Deductive content analysis of written comments focused on specific categories: positive or negative agentic or communal demeanors and characteristics, teaching skills, character and professionalism, leadership abilities, clinical skills and knowledge, and frequency of words and phrases used to describe residents. SETTING This study was conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. RESULTS Of 83 residents (71 females, 12 males), there was no statistical significance in the teaching performance evaluation scores between male and female residents (n = 10,753 total completed evaluations). Female residents had lower scores than male residents; males tended not to score below 4 (5-point response scale; 5 = outstanding). Of 3,813 written comments, male residents had more positive comments, with statistical significance in communal characteristics (71.4% male, 53.9% female, p = 0.01). Female residents received more negative comments, with statistical significance in communal characteristics (7.5% female, 2.8% male, p = 0.01). Frequency of words presented that male residents had more “standout” traits (“outstanding,” “excellent,” “exemplary”), “ability” terms (“intelligent,” “bright,” “talented,” “smart”), and were often considered “fun,” “funny,” and “humorous.” Female residents were described by “compassion” terms (“kind,” “compassionate”). CONCLUSION Student-completed teaching performance evaluations are a valuable assessment of teaching skills and influence department recognition, award distribution, fellowship and employment opportunities. This study found that medical students did evaluate female residents differently than male residents. Understanding gendered expectations may assist in findings ways to address discrepancies between male and female physician evaluations.