Nerve conduction studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome: Influence of timing and value of repeated measurements

Abstract Objective Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are essential to differentiate between demyelinating and axonal subtypes in Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). However, it is debated to which extent the delay of NCS after symptom onset and repeated measurements during the disease course influence the diagnostic accuracy. Methods We evaluated NCS in 93 patients with a classical GBS applying two widely used criteria (Hadden's and Rajabally's). The initial measurements after symptom onset were compared to follow-up studies where available (n = 43). We analyzed the influence of NCS timing after symptom onset and clinical severity on fulfilling the electrophysiological criteria for axonal or demyelinating subtypes and evaluated the impact of repeated measurements. We further evaluated the presence of reversible conduction failure. Results A higher GBS disability scale at nadir correlated with a successful subclassification whereas the delay of the first NCS after symptom onset did not influence the diagnostic yield (75% for Hadden's and 68% for Rajabally's criteria for the first assessment). A second measurement allowed the additional successful classification in 19% and 14% of patients, respectively. On the other hand, a repeated measurement in patients with an initial successful classification resulted in a different subtype in 5% and 7%, respectively. Reversible conduction failure was found in 7% of patients. Conclusion Clinical severity but not timing of NCS influenced the fulfilment of electrophysiological criteria for either the axonal or demyelinating subtype. Repeated electrophysiological measurements led to a further specification or a change in subtype classification in a relevant proportion of patients.