Differential clinical and pathological characteristics of esophageal stromal tumors and leiomyomata.

Summary The objective of the study was to assess the differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between esophageal stromal tumor and leiomyoma. Data from 93 esophageal stromal tumors and leiomyomata cases were retrospectively analyzed, including clinical symptoms, endoscopic features, pathological characteristics, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and treatment. All cases underwent endoscopic ultrasonography examination before treatment. Lesions arising from the muscularis mucosa were resected by endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. Lesions arising from the muscularis propria were resected by surgery. All specimens were examined by IHC. Patients were followed up after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. No difference was observed in clinical symptoms and endoscopic features between the two groups. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated all lesions to be hypoechoic and well circumscribed. Most lesions >2 cm had heterogeneous internal ultrasound signal. In esophageal stromal tumor, 100% (29/29) were CD117-positive and DOG-1-positive; 72.4% (21/29) and 51.7% (15/29) were CD34-positive and smooth muscle actin-positive, respectively. In esophageal leiomyomata, 100% (64/64) were smooth muscle actin-positive and desmin-positive; 100% were CD117-negative and DOG-1-negative. No local recurrence was detected in followed up patients (n = 49) after an average of 1.8 years (1.0–3.0 years). IHC analyses are important for distinguishing esophageal stromal tumor from leiomyoma. Early endoscopic resection is an effective treatment option for esophageal stromal tumors >1 cm.