904PDPre-operative ipilimumab and nivolumab in locoregionally advanced, stage III, urothelial cancer (NABUCCO)

Abstract Background Stage III (cT3-4aN0M0 or ≥cT1N+M0) urothelial cancer (UC) patients (pts) have a poor prognosis. Despite high response rates, pre-operative chemo shows limited survival benefit. Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 is active in metastatic UC; the combination of ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) appears to increase response rates. Encouraging path Complete Response (pCR) rates are observed in trials testing neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (mostly cT2-T3N0 pts). Here, we present the first clinical trial data on preoperative ipi+nivo. Methods This is a single-arm phase 1B trial testing the feasibility (primary endpoint) of pre-operative ipi+nivo in stage III UC pts (cis unfit/refusal). To mitigate the risk of immune-related toxicity, pts were treated with (based on melanoma data): ipi 3 mg/kg (day 1), ipi 3 + nivo 1 mg/kg (day 22), and nivo 3 mg/kg (day 43), followed by resection. Secondary endpoints were efficacy (pCR) and translational parameters: PD-L1, TMB (by WES), and immune cell infiltrates at baseline vs on-treatment using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF; pan-CK/CD3/CD8/FOXP3/CD20/CD68). Results 24 pts (14 cT3-4N0; 10 cN+) were enrolled, of whom 23 (96%) had resection Conclusions Preoperative ipi+nivo is feasible (96% surgery Clinical trial identification NCT03387761, January 2, 2018. Legal entity responsible for the study Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. Funding BMS. Disclosure M.S. Van der Heijden: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. T.N. Schumacher: Advisory / Consultancy: Adaptive Biotechnologies; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AIMM Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Allogene Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Merus; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Neon Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Scenic Biotech; Advisory / Consultancy: Third Rock Ventures; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck KGaA. P. Kvistborg: Advisory / Consultancy: Neon Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Personalis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString. B.W. van Rhijn: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Ferring. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.