Mosquito density, biting rate and cage size effects on repellent tests.

Mosquito biting rates and the mean duration of protection (in hours) from bites (MDPB) of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles quadrimaculatus, using the repellent ‘deet’ (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) on a 50 cm2 area of healthy human skin, were observed in small (27 l), medium (≈65 l) and large (125 l) cages containing low, medium or high densities of mosquitoes: respectively, 640, 128 or 49 cm3 of cage volume per female. At the initial treatment rate of ≈ 0.4 μl/cm2 (1 ml of 25% deet in ethanol on 650 cm2 of skin), the MDPB for deet against Ae.aegypti ranged from 4.5 to 6.5 h and was significantly less (5.0 ± 0.8 h) in large cages compared with medium (6.2 ± 0.9 h) and small (6.2 ± 0.8 h) cages, regardless of the density. Against An.quadrimaculatus the MDPB for deet 0.4 μl/cm2 was 1.5–8.0 h, less in small (3.7 ± 2.3 h) and large (2.2 ± 1.1 h) cages at medium (3.7 ± 2.3 h) and high (2.5 ± 1.7 h) mosquito densities, and was longest in medium cages (6.2 ± 2.6 h) at low mosquito densities (5.8 ± 2.8 h). With equinoxial photoperiodicity (light on 06.00–18.00 hours) the biting rate was influenced by the time of observation (08.00, 12.00, 16.00 hours) for Ae.aegypti but not for An.quadrimaculatus. For both species, the biting rate was inversely proportional to mosquito density and the MDPB. The shortest MDPBs were obtained in large cages with high densities of mosquitoes and longest protection times occurred in medium sized cages with low mosquito densities.