Automatic classification of paddy leaf disease

Riceisastaple f o o din m ost o ft h e A sianco u n tries.Itisani m p o rta n tcro p , and o v e r h alf o ft h e w orld p o p u l ationrelies o nit f or f o o d.H o w eve r, p ad d y le a f d ise a se c anaffe c t bo th t he q u alitya n d qu a n t i ty o f p a d d y i na g ricult u re p r o du ct i o n . T heclassi f ic a tion o f p a dd yl e a f d iseaseisani m p o rta n ta n d u r g enttaskasit d estro y sa bou t 10 %to15% o f p rod u ct i on i n A si a . T h u s,a stu d y o na u to m a ticcla s s i f ic a t i o n o f p a d dyle a f d isease u si n gi m age p r o c e s s i n gis p resente d . F e a t u ree x tra c ti o nte c hn i q u es o fcol o r,t ex tur e ,a n d shape we re i m pl e m e ntedtoa n a l yz et h echara c teristics o ft h e p ad d yle a f d ise a s e .Inanother no te,aSuppo r t V ector M a c h i ne(S V M)is u sed tocla s sify t h e f o u rt y pes o f p a dd yle a f d is e ase w h icharet h e b r o w ns p o t, b a cteri a lle a f b light, t u n grovirus,a n d l eaf s c a l d . T he p er f o r m a n ce o ft h e p r opo s e dst ud yis e va luatedto 1 60testi n gi mage s w hichret u r n e d 86 .2 5 % o fcla s si f i c ation a cc ura c y . T he ou tc o m e o ft h isst ud yise x p e ctedtoassistt h ea g r o te c hno l o g y i n dustryine a r l y d ete c ti o n o f p a dd yle a f d iseasein w hichanap p ropriate a c ti o nc o uld b e ta ke n ac c or d in g l y .