Comparison of Hemostatic Matrix and Standard Hemostasis in Patients Undergoing Primary TKA
2012
Bleeding after total knee arthroplasty increases the risk of pain, delayed rehabilitation, blood transfusion, and transfusion-associated complications. The authors compared pre- and postoperative decreases in hemoglobin as a surrogate for blood loss in consecutive patients treated at a single institution by the same surgeon (J.L.C.) using conventional hemostatic methods (electrocautery, suturing, or manual compression) or a gelatin and thrombin-based hemostatic matrix during total knee arthroplasty. Data were collected retrospectively by chart review. The population comprised 165 controls and 184 patients treated with hemostatic matrix. Median age was 66 years (range, 28-89 years); 66% were women. The arithmetic mean ± SD for the maximal postoperative decrease in hemoglobin was 3.18 ± 0.94 g/dL for controls and 2.19 ± 0.83 g/dL for the hemostatic matrix group. Least squares means estimates of the group difference (controls-hemostatic matrix) in the maximal decrease in hemoglobin was 0.96 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.14 mg/dL; P<.0001). Statistically significant covariate effects were observed for preoperative hemoglobin level (P<.0001) and body mass index (P=.0029). Transfusions were infrequent in both groups. The frequency of acceptable range of motion was high (control, 88%; hemostatic matrix, 84%). In both groups, overall mean tourniquet time was approximately 1 hour, and the most common length of stay was 3 to 5 days. No serious complications related to the hemostatic agent were observed. These data demonstrate that the use of a flowable hemostatic matrix results in less reduction in hemoglobin than the use of conventional hemostatic methods in patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
37
References
16
Citations
NaN
KQI