Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger: Calumny and the Politics of Reconciliation

This essay is about calumny as a rhetorical device. It is a case study of the false and malicious misrepresentation of the character and judgment of the social critic Hannah Arendt, calculated to undermine the legitimacy of her thought, which favored reconciliation with Germans after the defeat of the Third Reich and secular pluralism in the Middle East. The calumny about Arendt—that she was more German than Jewish and more sympathetic to rehabilitated Nazis than to the Jewish people—arose in reaction to her pluralistic criticism of Israeli militarism and international policy, but it touches upon her familiarity with German culture and people and her reconciliation with her teacher and one-time lover, Martin Heidegger. This essay confronts the calumny against Arendt’s integrity with the evidence of documents, letters, political writing, and other primary sources and accounts; it also calls attention to the destructive function of character assassination that chills free expression in human rights discourse. * Daniel Maier-Katkin is a Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice and a Fellow of the Center for the Advancement of Human Rights at Florida State University. ** Birgit Maier-Katkin is an Assistant Professor of German in the Department of Modern Languages at Florida State University. 2006 Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger 87