A comparative study of the efficacies of chloroquine and a pyrimethamine‐dapsone combination in clearing Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia in school children in Tanzania

A randomized study on the in vivo efficacies of chloroquine and a pyrimethamine-dapsone combination (Maloprim) in clearing P. falciparum parasitaemia was carried out in 77 asymptomatic semi-immune schoolchildren in the Kilombero District of Tanzania. Children were randomized to receive either chloroquine at a dose of 25 mg/kg over three days, or Maloprim (6.25 mg pyrimethamine+50 mg dapsone for children under 10 years, and 12.5 mg pyrimethamine+100 mg dapsone for children 10 or more years old) as a single dose. Children were followed-up for malaria parasitaemia at days 2, 7 and 14 after screening, randomization and treatment. The slide positivity rate was lower in the Maloprim group at all cross-sectional surveys (23 vs 37% at day 2; 9 vs 20% at day 7; 21 vs 32% at day 14) but none of these differences reached statistical significance. No cases in the Maloprim group showed RII resistance, whereas in the chloroquine group, 2 cases showed RII resistance and a further 2 cases RIII resistance (6%). No major side-effects were reported. The combination of pyrimethamine-dapsone appears to be a better choice than chloroquine as a chemoprophylactic regimen for malaria in this area. Although they need to be confirmed in a larger study, these results may be of interest to the policy-makers as well as researchers.