A 15 Year's Experience with Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement in Bangladesh.

This study was aimed to compare the long-term outcomes and survival rate among mitral valve replacement using thoracotomy and standard median sternotomy in a single surgeon's practice. Total 250 patients were evaluated; Group I (n=65) patients had anterolateral thoracotomy and Group II (n=185) had standard median sternotomy for valve replacement. Mean age was 25.1+/-5 years in Group I and 41.8+/-10.5 years in Group II. Female was predominant in Group I. Total operative time and bypass time was statistically significant in Group I (235.5+/-25.8 minutes; 84.2+/-12.75 minutes) in contrast to Group II (203.8+/-15.5 minutes; 71.5+/-10.5 minutes). Incision scar was not visible in females in Group I but full incision scar was visible in Group II. Post-operative ICU stay duration was significant high in Group II. Though, wound infection incidence was 0% in Group I; however, 9.73% patient had wound infection in Group II. Only 1.62% patient developed unstable sternum in Group II. Most of the patients from both study group were in regular follow up and 1-year mortality rate was 4.62% and 5.94% in Group I and Group II respectively. Mitral valve replacement through a right anterolateral thoracotomy is easy and safe to perform; while getting maximum benefits for the patients. Besides satisfactory cosmetic outcome especially in female, this approach provides better exposure to mitral apparatus even in patients with small left atrium, cost effectiveness, less duration of hospital stays and absence of the risk for unstable sternum.