P70 The impact of post COVID-19 rehabilitation on hospital and non-hospitalised participant- is there a difference?

P70 Table 1 All Hospitalised Mean difference (SD) Non-Hospitalised Mean difference (SD) Between group Difference Mean difference (95% CI) ISWT(m) 100.1(95.6)** 95.5(90.0)** 114.4(112.8)** 18.9(70.7,-32.9) ESWT(secs) 332.0(636.9)** 308.0 (686.4)** 417.2(422.2)** 109.1 (470.0, -251.7) QMVC (kg) 5.2(4.8)** 5.6(4.7)** 3.7(5.5) 1.9 (2.2,-6.0) FACIT 3.8(7.8)** 3.4 (7.4)* 5.1(9.2)* 1.8 (-2.6,6.2) CAT 2.6(6.0)** 2.8(5.6)** 0.7(7.2) 2.1 (5.4,-1.1) EQ-5D (thermometer) 7.7(20.1)** 11.0(19.4)** 3.9(19.0) 14.9 (3.2, 26.6)* MoCA 0.8(3.8) 0.8(4.2) 0.7(1.9) 0.08(2.2,-2.4) HAD-A 0.6(3.1) 0.6(3.0) 0.4(3.3) 0.2 (1.5,-2.0) HAD-D 1.1(3.5)* 1.3(3.4)* 0.5(3.8) 0.8(1.2,-2.7) *<0.05 **<0.01ConclusionEarly data suggests that those who have prolonged and significant symptoms post COVID-19 improve after a supervised rehabilitation programme. The response to the intervention is similar in both hospitalised and non-hospitalised groups. This is early cohort data and therefore must be treated with caution, nevertheless is encouraging.