Analyzing GDPR compliance of named data networking

2021 
The popularity of social media platforms, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and the myriad smartphone applications have created opportunities for companies and organizations to collect individuals' personal data and monetize its sharing at a high rate. A standout example was the Facebook--Cambridge Analytica data-sharing arrangement (2018), which allowed Cambridge Analytica to harvest millions of Facebook users' personal data without their consent for political advertisement. In response to such overreach and privacy violations, the European Union introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which mandates data collectors to protect individuals' data privacy and provide the user more control over their personal data. Motivated by this growing interest in personal privacy, we analyze GDPR articles in the context of Named Data Networking (NDN). The context of interest is NDN as the network architecture in a service provider and we investigate GDPR-pertinent NDN features, including naming, caching, forwarding plane, and its built-in trust, for GDPR compliance and present insights on how such compliance can be built, when lacking. We also present experimental results showing compliance overheads and conclude by identifying potential future work.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    24
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []