Comparison between new-generation SiPM-based and conventional PMT-based TOF-PET/CT

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to determine whether the SiPM-PET/CT, Discovery MI (DMI) performs better than the PMT-PET/CT system, Discovery 710 (D710). Methods The physical performance of both systems was evaluated using NEMA NU 2 standards. Contrast (%), uniformity and image noise (%) are criteria proposed by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) for phantom tests and were determined in images acquired from Hoffman and uniform phantoms using the DMI and D710. Brain and whole-body [ 18 F]FDG images were also acquired from a healthy male using the DMI and D710. Results The spatial resolution at 1.0 cm off-center in the DMI and D710 was 3.91 and 4.52 mm, respectively. The sensitivity of the DMI and D710 was 12.62 and 7.50 cps/kBq, respectively. The observed peak noise-equivalent count rates were 185.6 kcps at 22.5 kBq/mL and 137.0 kcps at 29.0 kBq/mL, and the scatter fractions were 42.1% and 37.9% in the DMI and D710, respectively. The D710 had better contrast recovery and lower background variability. Contrast, uniformity and image noise in the DMI were 61.0%, 0.0225, and 7.85%, respectively. These outcomes were better than those derived from the D710 and satisfied the JSNM criteria. Brain images acquired by the DMI had better grey-to-white matter contrast and lower image noise at the edge of axial field of view. Conclusions The DMI offers better sensitivity, performance under conditions of high count rates and image quality than the conventional PMT-PET/CT system, D710.