Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: evidences from the real-world data

The role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in stroke prevention remains unclear in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs in Asian patients with AF from the real-world settings. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify eligible observational studies until June 2019. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and then pooled by a random-effects model. A total of 18 observational studies were included. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran (OR, 0.56, 95% CI 0.43–0.73), rivaroxaban (OR, 0.54, 95% CI 0.44–0.67), apixaban (OR, 0.41, 95% CI 0.35–0.48), and edoxaban (OR, 0.19, 95% CI 0.14– 0.25) reduced the risk of major bleeding, while dabigatran (OR, 0.78, 95% CI 0.71–0.85), rivaroxaban (OR, 0.74, 95% CI 0.68–0.82), and edoxaban (OR, 0.29, 95% CI 0.22–0.39) were associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism. In addition, dabigatran versus apixaban was associated with increased risks of ischemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding, while rivaroxaban versus apixaban was associated with elevated risks of stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. In Asian patients with AF, NOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention, and apixaban may be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban.