Influence of free-stall flooring on comfort and hygiene of dairy cows during warm climatic conditions.

Abstract An evaluation of behavioral and hygienic conditions was carried out with 4 materials used as free-stall flooring for dairy cows: polyethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polypropylene vinyl acetate (PVA) mats, wood shavings, and solid manure. The free-stall type selected by cows was evaluated in response to changes in environmental temperature and humidity. Two tests were used: 1) a preference test, in which 8 cows were housed in a pen with 32 free stalls and 4 types of flooring; and 2) an aversion test, in which 32 cows were placed in 4 pens, each with 8 free stalls. The free stalls in each pen had a single type of bedding material. These tests showed that the comfort of dairy cows was predominantly influenced by environmental conditions. The preference test for lying showed that cows preferred free-stall floors with EVA mats over those with PVA mats, wood shavings, and solid manure (332.4±24.0 vs. 130.8±6.2, 160.9±23.7, and 102.6±23.2 min/d, respectively), but under conditions of heat stress, with a temperature–humidity index>80, they chose wood shavings and solid manure lying areas. These results were confirmed by the aversion test. In all experimental and environmental conditions, the PVA mats were the least suitable. The mats contaminated with organic manure and the free stalls bedded with wood shavings and organic solids did not differ in either the coliform load on the lying surfaces (EVA mats: 290±25; PVA mats: 306±33; wood shavings: 290±39; and solid manure: 305±23 log 10 cfu/mL) or the total bacterial count in the raw milk (EVA mats: 232±22; PVA mats: 233 + 24; wood shavings: 221±24; and solid manure: 220±25 log 10 cfu/mL). These results demonstrate that the comfort of dairy cows housed in barns with free stalls as resting areas does not depend only on the material used, but also on the value of the material in microenvironmental conditions.