Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass: A Series With Early Qualitative Angiographic Follow-up

Abstract Background . Notwithstanding the advantages offered by minimally invasive coronary bypass, valid concerns have been raised about the technical accuracy of the distal anastomoses that can be fashioned on a beating heart. The main objective of our study was to undertake early and complete qualitative angiographic graft analysis in all patients undergoing this procedure. Methods . All enrolled patients (25) from January to October 1996 who had bypass done by one surgeon via left minithoracotomy (19) or median sternotomy (6) on a beating heart underwent postoperative angiography within 4 to 6 hours. These angiograms were then reviewed for qualitative analysis and compared with a similar series done under conventional cardioplegic arrest. Results . There was 97.5% graft patency (28/29) and no anastomotic occlusions. One internal thoracic artery was damaged. There was no mortality and no perioperative myocardial infarctions. All patients are alive and symptom free. The follow-up is 100% complete and ranges from 15 days to 11 months. Of the 26 anastomoses that could be assessed, 21 (81%) were grade A and 5 (19%) were grade B. In comparison, 24/25 (96%) of the anastomoses fashioned on an arrested heart by the same surgeon were grade A ( p = 0.175). Conclusions . Minimally invasive coronary bypass can be carried out effectively and safely in a select group of patients, and the development of stabilizing devices and proper instrumentation should further improve results.