Cefepime use: a need for antimicrobial stewardship

Abstract Objectives Unlike other 3GCs, Cefepime is a cephalosporin that has, in animal model studies, shown a low risk of selecting resistant mutants. It also enables carbapenems to be saved in treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the CESP group (Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia and Providencia, as well as the genus Klebsiella aerogenes, Morganella and Hafnia), consequently producing cephalosporinase. We aimed to determine whether its prescription in a French teaching hospital met criteria for proper use. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective study of proper cefepime use between March 1st, 2018 and February 28th, 2019, to assess indication, antimicrobial stewardship, dosing schedule, microbiological documentation, reevaluation, and treatment duration. Prescriptions were then compared to local guidelines established from international literature. Results Out of 142 cefepime prescriptions, 97.2% were prescribed as validated according to indication. The duration of the documented treatments matched the guidelines for 56.5% of patients, dosage was adapted to the indication for 77.4% and to kidney function for 97.2%. Bacteriological documentation was performed in all cases and an antibiogram was generated in 99.2% of cases. The treatment was reassessed between 48 and 72 h and between the 7th and 10th day for 44.2% and 60.9% of the prescriptions respectively. The antimicrobial stewardship team managed half of the prescriptions. Only 13.4% of prescriptions met all criteria for proper use. Conclusion Notwithstanding a highly sizable majority of validated indications, a very small proportion of cefepime prescriptions met all the criteria for proper use. In the context of increased cefepime consumption, which is favored by its increased place in the latest recommendations published in 2019, proper use of cefepime prescriptions needs to be more effectively promoted.