Automated Fastener vs Hand-tied Knots in Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background Although several studies revealed that the Cor-knot automated fastener (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, the influence of the device on postoperative morbidity and mortality still needs to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the use of the Cor-knot device for heart valve surgery reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and this time saving translates into reduced morbidity and mortality. Methods Retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of the automated fastener vs hand-tied knots were reviewed. The following end points were compared: aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, postoperative valvular regurgitation, postoperative ejection fraction, prolonged ventilator support, renal failure, and mortality. Results Eight studies reporting data on 942 patients were included in the final analysis. The Cor-knot device was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (mean difference [MD], −11.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], −14.54 to −8.93; P Conclusions The use of the Cor-knot device in heart valve surgery reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Furthermore, as compared with hand-tie methods, the automated fastener may lead to decreased rates of prolonged ventilator support and valvular regurgitation while being noninferior in terms of other postoperative outcomes and mortality.