[Antihypertensive therapy and renoprotection: do we really need to block the renin-angiotension system?].

: Recent studies questioned the existence of a specific renoprotective effects of ACE-inhibitors (ACE-i) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) besides their blood pressure lowering effect. In the ALLHAT study patients were randomly assigned to receive chlorthalidone, amlodipine and lisinopril. Results showed that, even in patients with reduced GFR, neither lisinopril nor amlodipine was superior to chlorthalidone in reducing the rate of development of ESRD or a 50% or greater decrement in GFR. Because of inclusion criteria the ALLHAT population was selected as at low risk for renal outcomes. Moreover, over 50% of the patients who were randomized to lisinopril either never received the medication or received the lower possible dose. Casas et al selected RCT comparing ACE-i and ARBs with other regimens. They concluded that ACE-i and ARBs are not more renoprotective that can be explained by lowering of blood pressure (BP) in diabetic nephropathy, while in non diabetic kidney disease a blood pressure independent renoprotective effect is uncertain. They made a very heterogeneous selection of trials that was dominated by the ALLHAT study; the analysis was not based on individual patient data. The Benedict Study showed that in hypertensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes, BP reduction and ACE-i therapy both independently may prevent microalbuminuria. ACE-i therapy is particularly effective when BP is poorly controlled. We conclude that the recommendation of the Guidelines to use ACE-i and/or ARBs as first-line antihypertensive drugs for renoprotection in patients with diabetic and non diabetic kidney disease is still valid.