Comparison of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty and Conservative Methodologies for a PWR MSLB Analysis Using a Coupled 3-D Neutron-Kinetics/Thermal-Hydraulic Code

2017 
AbstractThis paper compares the Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) methodology with the Conservative Bounding methodology for design-basis-accident analysis. Calculations have been performed with TRACE [for thermal-hydraulic (TH) system calculations] and PARCS [for neutron-kinetics (NK) modeling] under the SNAP platform. DAKOTA is used under the SNAP interface for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. A simplified three-dimensional (3-D) neutronics model of the Asco II nuclear power plant is used as the core kinetic model. The TH model is a one-dimensional representation of the primary and secondary systems except for the vessel, which is represented by a 3-D VESSEL component. The design-basis transient selected for the comparison is a main steam line break (MSLB) in a pressurized water reactor. This transient is characterized by space-time effects and requires coupled 3-D kinetics and TH modeling, especially for the recriticality scenario. The comparison methodology is as follows. Once the models are ...
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    10
    References
    4
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []