Comparison of Dor and Nissen fundoplication after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Abstract Background Fundoplication is performed routinely during laparoscopic repairs of a paraesophageal hernia, but the degree of fundoplication remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess postoperative dysphagia and reflux after a Dor versus a Nissen fundoplication in patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias with Nissen or Dor fundoplication between January 2012 and December 2017 at a high-volume center, excluding revisional and emergency cases. Primary outcomes were reflux and dysphagia at 1 and 6 months. Severe dysphagia was defined as intolerance to liquids. Balanced cohorts were created using coarsened exact matching. Results A total of 106 patients were included, and 87 were matched (Dor = 48, Nissen = 58). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between matched groups. Mean follow-up duration was 17.7 months (standard deviation 16.4). The incidence of severe dysphagia at 1 month was less in the Dor group (0 of 48 vs 8 of 58, P = .02) with similar reflux symptoms. There was no difference in severe dysphagia and reflux symptoms at 6 months and at the latest visit. Conclusion Dor fundoplication is associated with less severe, early postoperative dysphagia. Future studies assessing the relative importance of dysphagia and reflux on quality of life should be conducted to tailor the operative technique and optimize patient satisfaction.