Satisfaction with Mental Health Navigation Services: Piloting an Evaluation with a New Scale

As mental health navigation services continue to be implemented, the need for valid and reliable tools to assess the quality of these services increases. While case managers target individuals with severe mental illness and aim to reduce burden and cost, and increase independence, navigation services target all individuals with a range of mental health and/or substance use issues, with the aim of reducing barriers to treatment and coordinating individualized care. The current study evaluated satisfaction with a navigation service using a new 22-item questionnaire, the Navigation Satisfaction Tool (NAVSAT). Forty clients completed a web-based version of the NAVSAT to evaluate satisfaction with a family mental health navigation service in Toronto, Canada. Descriptive statistics on the sample and range of treatments/services are provided. The NAVSAT has excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and face validity. Satisfaction with the following navigation-level factors were the best predictors of overall satisfaction with navigation; the navigator’s ability to recommend the appropriate treatment (β = 0.116, p = .05), intake procedures (β = 0.364, p = .005), and the principal contact’s satisfaction with his/her frequency of contact with the navigator (β = 0.602, p = .001). Satisfaction with the following provider-level factors were the best predictors of overall satisfaction with the referred service; the referred service’s ability to improve the youth’s well being (β = 0.684, p < .001), and the referred service’s ability to listen and understand the family’s concerns (β = 0.356, p = .001). The NAVSAT appears to be a reliable tool for measuring satisfaction in the current sample. If these findings are replicated in a larger population serving youth and young adults in transition, the NAVSAT may prove to be a helpful guide for program evaluation and development for navigation and treatment services for this population.