Rigid Ureteroscope Aided Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Objective To compare the outcomes of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement techniques in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery. Materials and Methods The patients were divided into two groups with respect to placement method of UAS. UAS was placed with the classical method, through the guidewire, in the first group of the patients (group I). The outer sheath of UAS was worn on the semirigid endoscope and placed into the ureter under direct vision in the second group (group II). The number of patients was the same in two groups (n = 42). Results Overall, 70 of 84 (83.3%) patients were stone free after the initial treatment. The success rates were comparable between the two groups (80.9% vs 85.7%, P  = .859) 1 month after surgery. Fluoroscopy screening time (11.7 ± 5.7 seconds vs 0 second), UAS placement time (245 ± 138.4 seconds vs 40 ± 17.9 seconds; P P  = .046) were significantly longer in group I when compared to group II. The complication rate was higher in group I when compared to group II (23.8% vs 9.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant ( P  = .079). Conclusion Introducing UAS into ureter under direct vision while it was precisely worn on ureteroscope makes this step safer, and protects the surgeon and patient from radiation exposure by shortening fluoroscopy and operation times.