Strict versus Lenient versus Poor Rate Control Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure (From the Get With The Guidelines – Heart Failure Program)

Paul L. Hess,Shubin Sheng,Roland A. Matsouaka,Adam D. DeVore,Paul A. Heidenreich,Clyde W. Yancy,Deepak L. Bhatt,Larry A. Allen,Pamela N. Peterson,P. Michael Ho,William R. Lewis,Adrian F. Hernandez,Gregg C. Fonarow,Jonathan P. Piccini

Strict versus Lenient versus Poor Rate Control Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure (From the Get With The Guidelines – Heart Failure Program)

2019

Paul L. Hess
Shubin Sheng
Roland A. Matsouaka
Adam D. DeVore
Paul A. Heidenreich
Clyde W. Yancy
Deepak L. Bhatt
Larry A. Allen
Pamela N. Peterson
P. Michael Ho
William R. Lewis
Adrian F. Hernandez
Gregg C. Fonarow
Jonathan P. Piccini

Abstract Randomized data suggest lenient rate control (resting heart rate 80 bpm were associated with adverse outcomes irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Keywords:

Poor rate
Diabetes mellitus
Ejection fraction
Atrial fibrillation
Heart failure
Internal medicine
Cardiology
Medicine
adverse outcomes
RESTING HEART RATE
rate control

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations