[Case control study on Zero-profile intervertebral fusion system and conventional cage-plate intervertebral fusion system for the treatment of multi-segment cervical spondylosis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical effect in the near future between Zero-profile intervertebral fusion system (Zero-P) and conventional cage-plate intervertebral fusion system (CCP) for the multi-segment(>=2 segments) cervical spondylosis. METHODS: Forty-two patients with cervical spondylosis who underwent multi-segment decompression of the cervical spine from October 2012 to October 2017 were selected as subjects. Zero-P was applied in 21 patients (Zero-P group) and CCP was applied in 21 patients(CCP group). The general condition and perioperative parameters of all the patients were recorded. VAS, JOA scores and incidence of dysphagia were observed before and after operation. The prevertebral soft tissue thickness was measured at 1 week, 1 month after operation and at the last follow-up. At the same time, the Cobb angle of the functional unit of the fusion segments was measured, and the overall curvature change of the cervical vertebra was observed. The clinical efficacy was reviewed at 1 week, 1, 3, 12 months after surgery, and the AP and lateral cervical X-rays were reviewed to evaluate the internal fixation effect. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, duration of disease, surgical segment, follow-up time and hospitalization time between two groups(P>0.05). The length of the surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage volume in the Zero-P group were(4.37±0.72) cm, (50.9±7.98)ml, (84.4±8.18) min, (76.2±10.13) ml, respectively, and those in CCP group were (6.50±0.71) cm, (108.6±9.25) ml, (118.6±8.55) min, (130.1±9.42) ml, respectively. There were signigicant differences in above items between two groups(P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall physiological curvature of the cervical vertebra between two groups (P>0.05). The prevertebral soft tissue thickness at 1 week, 1 month after operation, final follow-up respectively was(11.6±1.9), (9.8±1.4), (9.5±1.6) mm in Zero-P group, and in CCP group those were(12.5±2.6), (11.1±2.4), (11.0±1.9) mm, respectively. There were significant differences in each time point between two groups(P<0.05). At the last follow-up, no complication of dysphagia was found in Zero-P group, and three patients had dysphagia in CCP group, with a statistically significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple segmental decompression fusion to treat cervical spondylosis, regardless of the traditional CCP system or new Zero-P system are effective methods, but the Zero-P system has advantages of small surgical incision, short operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, convenient operation, better recovery of prevertebral soft tissue swelling, and lower possibility of postoperative dysphagia.