Doctor on board? What is the optimal skill-mix in military pre-hospital care?

Background In a military setting, pre-hospital times may be extended due to geographical or operational issues. Helicopter casevac enables patients to be transported expediently across all terrains. The skill-mix of the pre-hospital team can vary. Aim To quantify the doctors9 contribution to the Medical Emergency Response Team–Enhanced (MERT-E). Methods A prospective log of missions recorded urgency category, patient nationality, mechanism of injury, medical interventions and whether, in the crew9s opinion, the presence of the doctor made a positive contribution. Results Between July and November 2008, MERT-E flew 324 missions for 429 patients. 56% of patients carried were local nationals, 35% were UK forces. 22% of patients were T1, 52% were T2, 21.5% were T3 and 4% were dead. 48% patients had blast injuries, 25% had gunshot wounds, 6 patients had been exposed to blast and gunshot wounds. Median time from take-off to ED arrival was 44 min. A doctor flew on 88% of missions. It was thought that a doctor9s presence was not clinically beneficial in 77% of missions. There were 62 recorded physician9s interventions: the most common intervention was rapid sequence induction (45%); other interventions included provision of analgesia, sedation or blood products (34%), chest drain or thoracostomy (5%), and pronouncing life extinct (6%). Conclusion MERT-E is a high value asset which makes an important contribution to patient care. A relatively small proportion of missions require interventions beyond the capability of well-trained military paramedics; the indirect benefits of a physician are more difficult to quantify.