Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Abstract Background There has been increased use of adjustable suspensory fixation (ASF) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Potential benefits are the ability to use a shorter graft and to prevent graft displacement and damage. The purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy of this fixation method and assess whether it leads to less tunnel widening, and avoids known complications of screw fixation. Methods Thirty-eight patients who underwent ACLR with ASF on both the femoral and tibial sides met the inclusion criteria and were propensity matched demographically with 38 patients who underwent hybrid fixation with femoral suspensory and tibial screw and sheath. At one-year, KT-1000 knee laxity measurements were recorded and detailed MRI analysis looking at tunnel aperture widening, tunnel appearance, graft integration within the tunnels, and graft healing. Results MRI comparison between ASF and hybrid cohorts revealed no significant differences in graft signal or integration, and clinically there were no differences in knee laxity between cohorts (mean 1.5 mm ± 2.0 and 1.5 mm ± 2.3 (n.s.) in the ASF and hybrid fixation respectively). Significantly less aperture tibial tunnel widening (2.2 mm versus 4.4 mm, p  Conclusions Hamstring autografts for ACLR fixed using either ASF or a hybrid fixation technique provided comparable knee stability and MRI graft signal intensity. Tibial ASF demonstrated significantly less tibial aperture widening and tunnel cyst formation when compared to screw and sheath fixation.