An Innovative Approach for Familiarizing Surgeons with Malpractice Litigation

Objective Familiarize surgery residents with medicolegal knowledge and skills required when facing the prospect of being sued through a simulation session. Design The general surgery residency, hospital risk management, and malpractice attorneys collaboratively organized an educational intervention, consisting of an introductory lecture followed by a mock lawsuit. Two medical malpractice attorneys acted as defense and plaintiff attorneys while an attending surgeon experienced in litigation acted as defendant. Experience, attitudes, and preintervention/postintervention competency were evaluated via retrospective self-assessment. Setting Weekly departmental educational conference. Participants Forty residents and attending surgeons. Results Among the participants, 27.5% had been named in a law suit before. Most surgeons (70.0%) are worried about malpractice. Physicians who had been sued were no more likely to worry about malpractice (18.6 vs 25.0%, p = 0.82) than their colleagues who had never been sued. Results from the retrospective preintervention/postintervention competency assessment s  demonstrated significant improvement in all measured competencies after the mock lawsuit. In comparison with attending faculty, residents obtained greater improvements in understanding the essential elements of a medical claim (1.9 vs 1.1, p = 0.03), gaining confidence doing a deposition for medical litigation (1.9 vs 0.9, p Conclusions The novel educational format effectively familiarized surgery faculty and residents with the process of litigation and improved their confidence and mental preparedness when facing the prospect of a lawsuit. It is a valuable educational tool that can be incorporated in residency training and faculty development curricula.