A review and comparison of design methods for raft substructures on expansive soils

Abstract Shrink-swell movements of soils cause angular distortion to substructures leading to significant damage to lightweight structures. The built environment of lightweight structures, particularly single-detached dwellings, may compromise the structural performance and cause unforeseen maintenance that may expedite the deterioration of an entire build. Due to the importance of damage minimisation in the design phase of single-detached dwellings, this paper aims to review and compare existing design methods for raft substructures on expansive soils through parametric comparison. The comparison considered parameters related to soil properties, environmental factors and stress conditions, including substructure configuration, affecting the shrink-swell potential of expansive soils. The comparison observed that PTI method calculated beam depths with most proximate values to the overall median, while Lytton and Briaud method calculated beam depths closest to the overall third quartile with respect to all considered design methods. WRI and BRAB method obtained larger values of beam depths, specifically for scenarios with higher plasticity index, liquid limit and longer span, which can be considered as outliers. AS 2870, Walsh and Mitchell method were in the less conservative range based on the range of beam depths calculated. Calculated required beam depths ranged from 300 to 815 mm neglecting outliers with higher dispersion of values when the active depth zone was deeper, the plasticity index and liquid limit were higher, applied uniform load was higher and span of the substructure was longer. This review paper presents the range of probable values, variability and degree of central tendency depending on the values of beam depths calculated by different current design methods that are useful for designers.