Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes after Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 
Background:Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction.Hypothesis:Certain factors under the control of the surgeon at the time of revision surgery can both negatively and positively affect outcomes.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, intraoperative surgical technique and joint disorders, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Marx activity rating scale) completed before surgery. Patients were followed up for 2 years and asked to complete an identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to ...
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    26
    References
    22
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []