Comparing different approaches in robotic-assisted surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes at a short-term follow-up of MAKO versus NAVIO system.

The popularity of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) continues to grow among orthopaedic surgeons and robotic surgery may be helpful in obtaining a precise placement of the prosthetic components, thanks to the meticulous intra-operative computer study for simulating the prosthetic positioning. This may lead to longer implant survivorship as well as a reduction in intermediate and long-term prosthetic complications, despite the initial greater costs than those of manual UKA. In this preliminary study, from January 2017 and October 2017, 18 patients underwent UKA with MAKO robotic system assistance and 10 patients received UKA with NAVIO robotic system assistance. The two groups were homogeneous by age, BMI, degree of osteoarthritis involvement, and postoperative program. Patients were followed both clinically (Numeric Rating Scale NRS and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores KOOS) and radiographically. At the end term follow up (2 years), no significant difference was observed for NRS and KOOS as well as for clinical parameters as an active range of motion. A significant discrepancy was detected regarding the duration of the surgery and time of using the robotic system, that appeared to be longer in the NAVIO group than that of MAKO group, likely due to the specific technical aspects that characterize these two different robotic systems. The main finding of this study is that favorable clinical and radiographical results may be obtained using a robotic approach (MAKO or NAVIO) for UKA positioning at a short follow up. Due to the lack of significant clinical differences observed between the two groups of patients at end term follow up, the "concept" of a robotic approach, more than a specific patented system, may be considered the key element for improving UKA technique and it is likely that in the near future the choice of a single specific robotic system will still be a "surgeon's preference". The results of the study add scientific evidence regarding the effective improvement of UKA results using different robotic approaches. They also show possible economic sustainability of this therapeutic strategy related to the optimal patients' performance obtained at short term follow up, suggesting that the robotic assistance may really become a key element for better long-term survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.