Lich-Gregoir vesico-ureteral reimplantation for duplex kidney anomalies in the pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study between laparoscopic and open surgery

Background The aim of the study is to compare the Lich-Gregoir vesico-ureteral reimplantation in laparoscopy and open surgery. Methods In this case control study, we enrolled pediatric patients who were diagnosed with unilateral duplex kidney and had underwent surgical treatment. The surgical treatments were either conventional open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. We collected the basic demographic data and extracted the operative-related statistics such as operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain level, and post-operative complications. The two groups were compared using Student's t-test. Results A total of 90 subjects were enrolled. Of the enrolled subjects, 35 underwent open surgery and 55 underwent laparoscopic surgery. There were no observable difference in the basic demographics between two groups (P>0.05). The duration of operation in laparoscopic surgery group was significantly shorter than in the open surgery group (95.60±5.25 vs. 108.70±3.12 min, P=0.040). It was also noted that the amount of blood loss, length of hospital stay, drainage level, and the mean visual analog scale in laparoscopic group were significantly lower (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups were 16.36% and 37.14%, respectively. Conclusions Laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir vesico-ureteral reimplantation surgery management can be successful, clinically effective, and safe for pediatric population with functional duplex kidneys, and is better than the open surgery techniques.