Response to: 'Correspondence on "Glucosamine and O-GlcNAcylation: a novel immunometabolic therapeutic target for OA and chronic, low-grade systemic inflammation?' by Angelides and Manolios.

We have read with interest the comment from Angelides and Manolios in which they propose an alternative way to account for the potential mechanism of action of glucosamine in osteoarthritis (OA) and other chronic inflammatory diseases.1 Recent and robust epidemiological data suggest that sustained glucosamine intake could partially prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer.2 Our editorial made some hypothetical considerations about the mechanism of action of this compound.3 The editorial also commented on the difficulty of detecting a beneficial effect of glucosamine in OA, due to the modesty of the therapeutic effect, as well as the weakness of the methodological tools employed in OA clinical trials.3 In some way, the relationship between glucosamine and OA takes us fully into the pathophysiology that revolves around immunometabolic regulation, a driver that can account for tissue deterioration in various chronic diseases and …